Blog Purpose

The CTG Technical Blog is intended as a source of information on subjects related to industrial and precision cleaning technology. The writer of the blog, John Fuchs, has 40+ years of experience covering the entire gamut of cleaning. Mr. Fuchs has extensive knowledge of ultrasonic cleaning technology having been employed by Blackstone-Ney ultrasonics and its predecessors since 1968. The blog is also intended to serve as a forum for discussion of subjects related to cleaning technology. Questions directed to the blog will be responded to either in the blog (if the topic has general interest) or directly by email. Emails with questions about the current blog should be entered in the comments section below. Off-topic questions related to cleaning may be sent to jfuchs@ctgclean.com.

Metrology – Accuracy and Scale

May 16th, 2012

No matter what is being measured, it is critical that the measuring instrument chosen be capable of providing an accurate and repeatable measurement of whatever needs measuring.  It sounds simple – - but isn’t.  In general, the larger the scale the less accurate an instrument becomes.  Let’s use weight as an example.

Weighing devices come in a vast array of sizes, shapes and capacities.  A precision laboratory scale can usually weigh things down to a small fraction of a milligram.  Such a scale can, for example, easily measure the weight of a single penny.  In most cases the laboratory scale would also be able to measure the weight of at least several pennies.  Assuming that all pennies are of approximately the same weight, it would be an easy matter to determine how many pennies were on the scale by dividing their total weight by the known weight of a single penny.  Granted, the result of the division will not likely come out to be an exact integer but a little interpolation will tell you if there are 7, 8, or 12 pennies in the pile being weighed.  Now, let’s say that instead of a few pennies we have several thousand pennies.  Most precision laboratory scales are not capable of weighing thousands of pennies.  So, instead, let’s assume we use a bathroom scale.  The problem is that bathroom scale, although it is capable of weighing our several thousand pennies doesn’t give us a very accurate reading.  If it is one of those scales with a spring and a dial you may be able to read it with an accuracy of plus or minus one pound (and that’s assuming that the scale is correctly calibrated).  The best digital scale may read to an accuracy of plus or minus 1/10 of a pound and we all know that those scales, at least the ones in our Doctor’s offices, are subject to some real calibration problems.  All of a sudden, our old scheme of dividing the total weight by that of a single penny to determine how many pennies there are altogether becomes pretty useless.  We can get an approximate number but I don’t think any of us would place any bet that we would hit the number precisely.

The same is true in whatever we measure.  The larger the scale, the less accurate the measurement is.  In most cases a measuring instrument’s rated accuracy is given as a percentage its total capacity or “full scale.”  If a bathroom scale is capable of measuring 300 pounds and is accurate to 1% of its total scale then we know that we can expect that something that registers as 150 pounds on the scale may actually weigh anywhere from 147 to 153 pounds.  Using a different, more sophisticated device with the same 300 pound maximum capacity but an accuracy of .01% of full scale would narrow the range of our 150 pound object to between 149.7 and 150.3 pounds.  In either case, the 300 pound capacity scale would not be able to accurately weigh a single penny with sufficient accuracy to do that division thing described above.

Practical Demonstration - While standing on the bathroom scale (a digital one works best for this) start picking up pennies and putting them in your pocket.  See how many pennies you have to put in your pocket before the scale jumps to the next number.  Then pick up a bowling ball!  The bathroom scale barely sees pennies but can, easily, detect a bowling ball in your pocket!

This basic example applies to any measuring task we undertake.  A 50 foot tape measure is not appropriate for measuring a few 1000ths of an inch nor is it appropriate for measuring the distance to the moon.  Those tasks require other instruments.

Finally, when taking measurements of any kind make sure you know the accuracy of the device being used and factor the possible inaccuracy into any conclusions drawn as a margin of error.

-  FJF  -

Metrology – What to Measure

May 14th, 2012

At first it may sound like a “no-brainer,” but deciding what to measure can be a challenge.    The first part of that challenge is determining what measurements are required to establish that a particular criteria has been met.  The next is to determine if the tools required to perform the required measurements are available and, if not, how to assure that requirements are met using the tools that are available.

Let’s say, for example, that we need to determine the size of a metal plate  and also determine if it is a square.  We have at our disposal the capability to measure length using a tape measure but do not have the capability to measure angles.  We know that a square is a shape defined as having four equal sides which are all straight lines.  In addition, however, to be a square, that shape must have right angles at the corners.  Measuring the four sides of our metal plate and finding them all of equal length does not allow us to conclude that the shape is a square because the corners might not be right angles.

By definition a square has four sides of equal length arranged with 90 degree angles at the corners. Both criteria must be met for the object to be a square. A rectangle would have four sides with 90 degree angles at the corners but would not be a square because not all sides would be the same length.

Instead, the shape may be a parallelogram which meets that criteria for all sides being equal but does not meet the second requirement of the angles being right (or 90 degree) angles.  Now, since we have the capability to measure lengths but no capability to measure angles we can not, on the basis of all sides being of equal length, be certain that the metal plate is a square without knowing the angles at the corners.  With a little ingenuity (and even less math), however, we can determine if the plate is a square.  We know that if an object is a square its diagonals must also be of equal length.  We could use a little bit more difficult math and figure out what the length of the diagonal for a triangle with two equal sides of a particular length should be for the angle at their intersection to by a 90 degree angle.  But there is an even more simple solution.  The diagonals must be of equal length!  So, by measuring the four sides and determining that they are all the same length and then the diagonals to assure that they are of equal length it is possible to meet our needs using only measurements of length.

Illustration showing how a measurement of diagonals can determine a square.

Lacking the means to measure angles, a square shape can be verified by measuring its diagonals. If they are the same, and the lengths of all four sides are the same, the shape is a square.

In some cases, alternative means as described above can give more accurate measurements than those that would be considered immediately intuitive or “conventional.”  In surveying land, for example, it is easy to measure length to a greater accuracy than it is to measure angles.  Let’s say that a surveyor wants to mark out a plot of land that is 100 feet on a side and exactly square.  Starting from a corner, the surveyor establishes a point exactly 100 feet away using a tape measure.  The surveyor sights that point from the starting point using a transit (that telescope-like thing that surveyors use).  The surveyor then turns the transit 90 degrees (the telescope is calibrated) to establish the line along which to measure the second 100 foot long side.  A transit is a very precise instrument which is capable of measuring angles with reasonable accuracy but, unfortunately, a very small inaccuracy in measuring the angle will result in much amplified inaccuracy as the distance from the device is increased.  Since measurements of distance are typically more accurate than measurements of angles, measuring the lengths of the diagonals will, in this case, likely result in the establishment of a more accurate plot of the land.

Interesting Sidelight - A neighbor of mine was recently in the process of laying a cement block foundation for a shed he had purchased.  He knew the dimensions of the shed but also needed to assure that the foundation he was about to build had square corners.  As an engineer, I saw this as a real challenge.  I have a builders square but, surely, that would not accurately establish a reliably square corner as its longest arm is only about 2 feet in length and the shed was 10 feet by 12 feet.  The neighbor, however, had an interesting and simple solution that he called the 3, 4, 5 rule.  A triangle with sides with the length relationship of 3 units, 4 units and 5 units, defines a right angle at the intersection of the 3 and 4 unit long sides.  This was a simple way to define his square corners which, being the engineer that I am, I had to verify using my equal diagonal rule as described above.  The neat thing is that the units can be anything – inches, feet, meters, yards, miles . . .

There are many cases where the “obvious” measurements result in findings that are either less accurate than possible or that are just downright meaningless.  Determining what parameters to use to achieve the required accuracy is critical to successful metrology.

-  FJF  -

Metrology – Standards

May 11th, 2012

Metrology, simply, is the science of measuring things.  Metrology is used extensively in the world of industrial cleaning to both control and quantify cleaning processes.  Finding the right equipment and procedures to produce accurate and meaningful results is often a challenge for those without extensive knowledge of the science.  The upcoming blogs on metrology are intended as “food for thought” and are intended only to heighten the reader’s awareness of the fundamentals of the science.  I’ll start off with a blog discussing something called “standards.”  Standards are the foundation of metrology.

Standards -

Metrology quantifies things like weight, length, time, temperature and volume by comparing whatever is being measured to a standard.  A standard unit of measurement, in turn, is determined by comparing it to another, presumably more authoritative standard.  Eventually, the ultimate standard is reached by tracing the “heritage” of the standard to its source.  The first standards for the measurement of length, for example, were things like the length of a particular person’s arm, finger or whatever.  In many cases, the individual was a king or some other prominent individual.  Clearly, that was not a very good standard as the individual was not always available to perform his (or her) duty of a “standard.”  Furthermore, the king may not be king forever.  When the king changed, the length of the king’s arm changed as well.

To be able to measure things when the individual who was the “standard” was not available, sticks were cut to the same length as the king’s arm and used in its stead as a means of measuring.  In turn, additional sticks were cut to the same length as those that had been cut to the same length as the king’s arm to be used as ”standards.”  The problem, of course, was that the accuracy of measurement was dependent on how accurately the “copy” sticks were cut.  The more copies away from the king’s arm, the more inaccurate the standard for measurement became.  We still have standards for units of measure today but they are much more accurate than the length of the king’s arm.  Today’s standards for length are based on the wavelength of a particular color of light and other natural “constants” that, at least in the world as we know it, have been and will remain the same forever.

In another example of the development and evolution of a standard, one of the earliest temperature standards was the normal temperature of the human body known as “blood heat.”  Unfortunately, this was an unreliable standard because the temperature of the human body can vary several degrees even in healthy individuals.  Eventually, more reliable constants were found in the melting and boiling points of water which were used to establish the Celsius scale of temperature on which 0 degrees is the melting point of water and 100 degrees is the boiling point of water (both at standard atmospheric pressure).

Today’s “standards” are carefully and universally defined worldwide.  In the United States, the National Bureau of Standards is responsible for maintenance of these standards.  In order to assure universal accuracy, critical measurements are always made using instruments that have been carefully calibrated to agree with the National Bureau of Standards master standards.  Since it is not possible for every instrument to be compared directly to the National Bureau of Standards master standards, procedures have been developed which assure accuracy through a “heritage” of standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards master standards.  The accuracy of even something as simple as a carpenter’s tape measure can usually be traced to the National Bureau of Standards master standard.  Many, many years ago, I was visiting a well-known major manufacturer of steel tape measures and asked about traceability to the standard thinking surely they must just print lines on a strip of metal.  In response, I was shown a thin strip of metal about 50 feet in length kept in a temperature controlled room under constant, exact tension with several scribe marks so fine that they were invisible without powerful magnification.  That metal strip had actually been certified by the National Bureau of Standards as a standard unit of measure with an accuracy within several parts per million.  I’m sure that metal strip has since been replaced with some sort of laser measuring means but I must admit that, at the time, it was pretty impressive.  Clearly, certifying the accuracy of their tape measures was serious business to this company.

Establishing and maintaining accurate standards and the calibration of measuring instruments to those standards is an important part of metrology.  Knowing how to use the available instruments to produce meaningful results, however, is often even more important.  We’ll talk more about that in upcoming blogs.

-  FJF  -

 

The More Things Change . . .

May 9th, 2012

Deep in a file drawer in my office on a couple of pieces of paper yellowed by time is an article that, written and published in 1954, is a literal snapshot of the notion and perceived traits of an engineer over 50 years ago – when I was only 9 years old.  Every once in a while I come across this article and read it again trying to understand how the engineering profession has changed and if the “Engineer Personality” has been modified over the years as the article recommends.

Here is the article – -

Engineer Personality

Somehow, I don’t really feel that today’s engineers exhibit the characteristics the article implies and, yet, maybe they do.  I think today’s engineering tools which are quite similar to those used by other professions including bankers and lawyers (namely the computer) have helped the engineer become less easily distinguished from other professions.  Few engineers today wear “pocket protectors” which shouted “nerd” in my early engineering days.  Likewise, knowledge of tools like drafting tables, T-Squares, plastic triangles with 45, 30 and 60 degree corners, french curves and slide rules no longer physically distinguish the engineer from other “normal” working people.  And yet, there is something distinctly different about the person who has chosen the engineering profession – - even today.  I would like to hear from those of you who are or work with engineers to regarding the relevancy of this article concerning the “Engineer Personality.”  Are we making progress?  Are the same traits still present and do these traits truly differentiate the engineer?  Can we hold our heads high or are we still social misfits as the article implies?  How do you feel?

One thing I DO know is that an engineer never stops being an engineer – something I’ve found both troubling and useful as I’ve grown older.  There is always some new theory to test or some new concept to try to understand.  There must be something about being an engineer . . .

-  FJF  -

The Sounds of Silence – Sweep

May 4th, 2012

Sweep in ultrasonic lingo simply means varying the ultrasonic frequency up and down.  A sound clip in an earlier post demonstrated the sound of sweeping the ultrasonic frequency.

Single Frequency Sweep

In an earlier post we also learned that ultrasonic transducers have a property called “resonance.”  Very simply, this means that they will make a louder sound (higher amplitude vibration) when driven at their resonant frequency.  The following sound clip illustrates what the sound coming from an ultrasonic transducer might sound like as the frequency is changed from the resonant frequency to a lower frequency then back through the resonant frequency to a higher frequency and then back to the resonant frequency.  Notice the change in the loudness of the sound as the frequency is changed.

Frequency Sweep Demonstrating Resonance

Looking at the waveform, the effect of changing frequency looks something like this - -

 

Illustration showing resonance at the center frequency of a frequency sweep

Ideally, the resonant frequency of the transducer is in alignment with the frequency sweep as shown above. Resonance occurs twice during each frequency sweep cycle.

The trouble with this picture is that the peak amplitude at resonance occurs in a regular pattern.  If an object being cleaned exhibits a resonance at the frequency equal to twice that of the sweep rate, the sweep will excite the object into resonance potentially causing damage.

In order to eliminate the possibility of damage due to resonance at twice the sweep frequency, today’s ultrasonic generators are capable of varying the rate of sweep with the result shown below.

Illustration of the effect of random sweep

In the lower example above, the sweep frequency is changing to prevent regularly spaced resonance intervals.

Sweep can be varied either on a regular basis as can be heard in the sound clip below

Varying Sweep Rate

Or the sweep rate can be varied randomly as demonstrated in the following sound clip

Random Sweep Rate

For now, this will be the end of the Sounds of Silence series.  The series, however will resume when we discuss more complex waveforms where center frequency, amplitude and sweep are all varied in a single ultrasonic cleaning tank.

-  FJF  -

Still Learning and How to Still Learn

May 2nd, 2012

As some of you may have noticed, the illustrations in Monday’s (30 April, 2012) were incorrect.  For those of you who didn’t notice, that’s OK – because I didn’t either.  It is interesting how much more thoroughly you understand something once you’ve tried to convey it to someone else.  Regular readers will know that I, to my surprise, scored very poorly on the pronunciation blog some time ago.  I only noticed the errors in the blog referenced above when I started to write what was to be today’s blog about double sweep.  Somehow things just didn’t “fit” which led me to re-examine the drawings.  Now that the corrections have been made, I can re-address writing that blog which will appear as the next in this series.

As I take a breath here, it’s probably worth suggesting that we all take a little time now and then to assess our understanding of certain things we think we already fully understand.  One good way to test your understanding is to try to convey your understanding to another person.  It doesn’t matter if the person already has knowledge of the subject or not – I can almost assure you that both parties will have a better understanding of the subject once the discussion has ended.  I know that writing this blog has led me to many unexpected revelations as, basically, it is a conversation with myself.  It has also made me realize that mis-understanding something can be forgiven while leading others to the same mis-understanding is unforgivable.  Maybe there’s some kind of message here or I may just be babbling (as usual).  That’s a question best answered by a philosopher, not an engineer.

Have a GREAT day!

-  FJF  -

Sounds of Silence – Sweep

April 30th, 2012

Note – The illustrations initially appearing in this post were inaccurate.  Instead of showing a constant rate of change in frequency, they depicted a rate of change in frequency that increased as the frequency increased.  If you are seeing this message, the illustrations in the blog below are correct.  I’m sorry for any confusion this error on my part may have caused for readers of the initial blog.  -  FJF  -

In today’s blog we once again bring ultrasonic sounds into the range of human audibility and listen to the sound of frequency sweep.  Previous blogs have revealed the sound of amplitude modulation and pulse modulation.  Frequency sweep is all about frequency – ideally there is no change in amplitude as frequency is varied.  In some of the following sound clips you might think there is a change in amplitude as frequency varies.  This is a sort of an audio illusion.  The human ear perceives sounds at different frequencies with varying sensitivity.  Lower frequency sounds are generally perceived to have lower amplitude than higher frequency sounds.  There also may be variations in the ability of whatever device you are using to listen to these sounds to reproduce them.  No amplifier/speaker combination is completely linear in its ability to reproduce sounds at different frequencies.  Laptop computers are notorious for poor sound reproduction so I might recommend that you take this opportunity to grab  your headphones before listening to the sound clips.

Varying Frequency -

In this example only the frequency of the sound will change.  The sound starts at a frequency.  Then the frequency is reduced.  After the lowest frequency is reached, the frequency is increased passing through the starting frequency and on to the highest frequency in the sweep and then back to the starting frequency.  The starting, intermediate and ending frequency is commonly known as the “center” frequency of the sweep.  The X-Y plot looks like this -

And sounds like this – -

Single Frequency Sweep

Range or Deviation -

Increasing the range of sweep decreases the lowest frequency and increases the highest frequency.  The starting, intermediate and ending frequencies remain the same.  The X-Y comparison of increased sweep range compared to the plot above looks like this -

In the following sound clip, the sweep range starts at zero or no deviation.  This is a steady tone also known as the center frequency.  As the clip progresses, the deviation of the sweep is increased to a maximum and then reduced again to zero.  It sounds like this – -

Varying Frequency Deviation or Range

Sweep Frequency -

The rate at which the frequency is varied is the “sweep frequency.”  The following X-Y plot shows a sweep frequency double that of the first illustration above.

In the following sound clip, the frequency sweep range remains constant but the frequency sweep rate starts at a relatively low frequency, increases to a high frequency and then returns to the starting, low frequency – -

Varying Sweep Frequency

Combining the variables of amplitude, pulse and frequency allow a great deal of flexibility in ultrasonic cleaning.  Proper selection of these parameters can improve the ultrasonic cleaning effect while reducing the possibility of part damage.  Upcoming blogs will explain in more detail how to select the correct combination for a particular application.

Oh, and by the way, I will not be responsible if you decide to insert that last sound clip into the startup folder of your computer (or someone else’s?).

-  FJF  -

Agitation – Reducing Agitation Stroke Requirement

April 27th, 2012

The preceding blog described the benefit of part agitation in a cleaning process.  But, it is not always possible to provide adequate part agitation with a simple agitation of the part parallel to its central axis.  With a little creativity, it is possible to provide effective agitation of even very long parts.  In fact, there may be a surprising benefit of changing the orientation of a part to reduce the stroke required for its agitation.

Using a tube open on both ends for an example as we did in the previous blog, it is clear that to provide sufficient agitation stroke parallel to the axis of the part to both completely immerse it in and completely remove it from the cleaning liquid would require a tank depth sufficiently in excess of the length of the tube to allow for the agitation mechanism.  But, what if you have a tube that is 30 feet long?  Very few equipment manufactures would consider making a tank 30 feet deep, not to mention that to accommodate the agitation would require a 60+ foot high ceiling in the building housing the equipment.  The simple solution (which sounds like a “no-brain-er” but is often overlooked as an alternative) is to position the part on an angle as shown below.

Illustration of the effect of re-orienting a part on stroke length requirement.

By changing the orientation of a part, the agitation stroke amplitude required to completely fill and drain the part can be significantly reduced.

Positioning a part on an angle reduces the agitation stroke required to completely fill and drain the part significantly.  If I were a mathematician I would go through all the trigonometry to figure out what the reduction would be for a particular angle – but a mathematician I am not!  Suffice to say re-orienting the part for cleaning may provide a voila moment.

The following video illustrates the effect of placing a tube on an angle for cleaning.

Now for the surprise.  When the part is placed on an angle for agitation the speed of flow through the part as it is agitated is increased.  As an example, if a tube is agitated parallel to its axis with a 2″ per second stroke the speed of motion of the liquid within the tube is 2″ per second.  If, however, the same tube is placed at a 45 degree angle and the vertical agitation is at a speed of 2″ per second the speed of flow through the tube as it fills and empties is  2.828″ per second (OK, so I do know a little trigonometry – but don’t tell anybody).  An even more shallow angle will increase the rate of flow even more.  Faster flow can, in fact, enhance cleaning!  There may, therefore, be an added benefit to re-orienting a part for agitation.

There are a lot of things to think about when it comes to agitation.  So far, we haven’t talked about the speed of agitation but that is another significant variable that often isn’t considered.  Agitating a part rapidly by hand in a laboratory test may produce results that a slower agitation provided by a cleaning machine can’t equal.  Agitation speed is a topic for another blog.

-  FJF  -

Adequate Part Agitation Facilitates Cleaning – Stroke

April 25th, 2012

Inadequate or improper agitation of parts in a cleaning tank is a common problem in industrial cleaning.  Agitation, if properly applied, can be a very powerful aid to cleaning.  The result of improperly applied agitation, however, can range from disappointing to disaster.

The basic reason to agitate a part in a cleaning tank is to provide or encourage a flow of liquid over both the inside and outside surfaces of the part being cleaned.  This flow helps flush away contaminants that have been loosened or dissolved by the cleaning chemistry.  In the case of parts with internal cavities, proper agitation can serve to exchange contaminated chemistry within the cavity with uncontaminated chemistry so that the cleaning process can continue to completion.  Inadequate agitation stroke (distance of movement) can prevent the effectiveness of agitation in this process.  The following graphic shows this more clearly than I can describe it in words.

Illustration of the effect of changing agitation stroke.

The above illustration demonstrates the effect of increasing the stroke of agitation on cleaning the interior of a tube open at both ends. It is obvious that if the tube is not fully immersed, the portion of the part that is not immersed will not be cleaned. What is not so obvious is that insufficient agitation stroke may result in incomplete cleaning even in the part of the tube that is repeatedly immersed. The stroke or distance of travel of the agitation increases from example "A" to example "D".

The same problem exists even with a part with a confined space that is open on both ends and is fully immersed.  If the agitation stroke is not sufficient to totally displace the liquid within the length of the confined space, a total exchange of liquid within the part will not occur.  Theoretically, the immersion stroke of a totally immersed part should be equal to at least 1/2 the total height of the confined portion of the part.  More is better!

Finally, if a picture is worth 1,000 words, a video should be worth at least a couple hundred more.  In the following video, a glass tube contaminated with food coloring dye is immersed in the laboratory fish tank we’ve discussed before.  The effect of increased agitation is obvious.

There are other aspects of agitation other than stroke that can have significant effect on its effectiveness.  There are also times when full immersion and withdrawal of a part is not practical.  This is especially the case in parts that have a large dimension in the direction of travel for agitation.  Some of these issues will be discussed in the next blog.

-  FJF  -

Valves – Considerations for Specifying Automated Valves

April 23rd, 2012

The specification of automated valves requires certain considerations that are not of concern with typical manually operated valves.  The blog Valves – Automated Valves – What’s Different? provided a glimpse of automated valves with a very simple (but typical) example.  There are, of course, innumerable variations used in the design of automated valves so the information here may not apply universally but is intended for awareness purposes only.  Each case should be reviewed individually.  This blog will endeavor to discuss in more detail what these differences mean in the actual application of automated valves.

In most cases, manual valves don’t really care much about the direction of flow.  A ball valve, for example, couldn’t care less if the inlet and outlet are reversed, it will work equally as well in both directions.  There are usually no serious consequences of reversed direction of flow in globe valves and gate valves although they are intended to be used in a particular orientation.  If the valve includes other features like, for example, a pressure relief on the inlet or outlet or an integrated union, then orientation may be important for that feature to be functional but as far as the valve goes, it just doesn’t care.

In a majority of cases, however, automated valves are intended to and ONLY work when the flow through the valve is in a particular direction.

Basic automated valve schematic

Automated valves often use the incoming pressure to hold the valve closed.

As the above illustration shows, many automated valves depend on the inlet pressure to assist in closing and holding the valve closed when flow is not desired.  The spring force alone is often not sufficient.  Similarly, if the flow through the valve is reversed, the pressure of the spring is not adequate to prevent the flow of liquid through the valve in the reverse direction.  In specifying an automated valve, it must be determined that the incoming pressure will always be sufficient to assure valve closure.  The valve also must not be relied upon to prevent flow in the direction opposite to that of the intended flow.

An especially good example of a potential problem with automated valves is their application in tank drain lines.  Since the pressure at the drain is usually provided only by the depth of liquid above it, many automated valves can not be relied on to close and stay closed under this relatively low pressure condition.  The problem becomes of even more concern if there is any potential for back pressure on the drain from, for example, other drains connected to a common manifold.  If more than one drain source is flowing to the manifold at the same time, the resulting back pressure may force liquid back through a valve that is intended to be closed.

Just as there can be too little pressure for an automated valve to work properly, there can also be too much pressure at the inlet.  In order for the valve to open, the actuator (solenoid or whatever) must be able to overcome the inlet pressure that is assisting in holding the valve closed.  In high differential pressure applications, an automated valve with a “pilot operator” may be required.  In this type of valve, a solenoid (or other actuator) first opens a small orifice which allows a sufficient flow to relieve pressure on the main orifice to allow it to be fully opened by the available actuating force.

Clearly, there is a lot more to know about automated valves than can be covered in this short blog.  The important thing to take away from today’s discussion is that automated valves are different and require different considerations than manually operated valves.  Additional tips on effectively using automated valves will be a subject for upcoming blogs.

-  FJF  -